Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Non-Auto-Injector Epinephrine Administration by Basic Life Support Providers: A Literature Review and Consensus Process

  • John W. Lyng
  • , Chelsea C. White
  • , T. Quigley Peterson
  • , Heidi Lako-Adamson
  • , Jeffrey M. Goodloe
  • , Michael W. Dailey
  • , Brian M. Clemency
  • , Lawrence H. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening condition with a known effective prehospital intervention: parenteral epinephrine. The National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) advocates for emergency medical services (EMS) providers to be allowed to carry and administer epinephrine. Some states constrain epinephrine administration by basic life support (BLS) providers to administration using epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs), but the cost and supply of EAIs limits the ability of some EMS agencies to provide epinephrine for anaphylaxis. This literature review and consensus report describes the extant literature and the practical and policy issues related to non-EAI administration of epinephrine for anaphylaxis, and serves as a supplementary resource document for the revised NAEMSP position statement on the use of epinephrine in the out-of-hospital treatment of anaphylaxis, complementing (but not replacing) prior resource documents. The report concludes that there is some evidence that intramuscular injection of epinephrine drawn up from a vial or ampule by appropriately trained EMS providers—without limitation to specific certification levels—is safe, facilitates timely treatment of patients, and reduces costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855-861
Number of pages7
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2019

Keywords

  • anaphylaxis
  • EMS
  • epinephrine
  • intramuscular epinephrine
  • prehospital

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-Auto-Injector Epinephrine Administration by Basic Life Support Providers: A Literature Review and Consensus Process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this