Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nintedanib in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Marya Ghazipura
  • , Manoj J. Mammen
  • , Derrick D. Herman
  • , Stephanie M. Hon
  • , Brittany D. Bissell
  • , Madalina Macrea
  • , Fayez Kheir
  • , Yet H. Khor
  • , Shandra L. Knight
  • , Ganesh Raghu
  • , Kevin C. Wilson
  • , Tanzib Hossain
  • ZS Associates
  • Divisions of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
  • Ohio State University
  • Tufts University
  • Critical Care
  • University of Kentucky
  • VA Medical Center
  • Harvard University
  • Austin Health
  • University of Melbourne
  • National Jewish Health
  • University of Washington
  • Boston University
  • New York University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociacion, Latinoamericana del Torax, convened to update clinical practice guidelines for interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate existing ILD literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic nintedanib. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using nintedanib to treat patients with PPF. Data Extraction: Mortality, disease progression, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Two relevant studies were selected. The annual decline in forced vital capacity was less in the nintedanib arm in the overall study population (mean difference [MD], 107 ml/yr; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4 to 148.5 ml/yr) and in the subgroups with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of pulmonary fibrosis (MD, 128.2 ml/yr; 95% CI, 70.8 to 185.6 ml/yr), non-UIP patterns of pulmonary fibrosis (MD, 75.3 ml/yr; 95% CI, 15.5 to 135.0 ml/yr), fibrotic connective tissue disease-related ILD (MD, 106.2 ml/yr; 95% CI, 10.6 to 201.9 ml/yr), fibrotic idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (MD, 141.7 ml/yr; 95% CI, 46.0 to 237.4 ml/yr), and fibrotic occupational ILD (MD, 252.8 ml/yr; 95% CI, 79.2 to 426.5 ml/yr), but not fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (MD, 72.9 ml/yr; 95% CI, 28.9 to 154.7 ml/yr), fibrotic sarcoidosis (MD, 220.5 ml/yr; 95% CI, 2337.1 to 296.1 ml/yr), or unclassified fibrotic ILD (MD, 68.5 ml/yr; 95% CI, 231.3 to 168.4 ml/yr) when compared with placebo. Gastrointestinal side effects were common. Quality of evidence for the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate GRADE. Conclusions: Nintedanib use in patients with PPF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in disease progression but increase in gastrointestinal side effects regardless of the radiographic pattern of pulmonary fibrosis. However, limitations in the available evidence lead to low certainty in these effect estimates and make definitive conclusions about the differential effects by subtype of ILD difficult to determine. Primary Source of Funding: Funded by the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociacion, Latinoamericana del T,orax.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1040-1049
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • antifibrotic
  • idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
  • interstitial lung disease
  • nintedanib
  • progressive pulmonary fibrosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nintedanib in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this