Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nevirapine- Versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Infants and Young Children: Long-term Follow-up of the IMPAACT P1060 Randomized Trial

  • Linda Barlow-Mosha
  • , Konstantia Angelidou
  • , Jane Lindsey
  • , Moherndran Archary
  • , Mark Cotton
  • , Sylvia DIttmer
  • , Lee Fairlie
  • , Enid Kabugho
  • , Portia Kamthunzi
  • , Arti Kinikar
  • , Tapiwa Mbengeranwa
  • , Levina Msuya
  • , Pauline Sambo
  • , Kunjal Patel
  • , Emily Barr
  • , Patrick Jean-Phillipe
  • , Avy Violari
  • , Lynne Mofenson
  • , Paul Palumbo
  • , Benjamin H. Chi
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Harvard University
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Perinatal HIV Research Unit
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • BJ Government Medical College
  • University of Zimbabwe
  • Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College
  • University Teaching Hospital Lusaka
  • Henry M. Jackson Foundation
  • Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
  • Dartmouth College

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) P1060 study demonstrated short-term superiority of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) over nevirapine (NVP) in antiretroviral therapy (ART), regardless of prior NVP exposure. However, NVP-based ART had a marginal benefit in CD4 percentage (CD4%) and growth. We compared 5-year outcomes from this clinical trial. Methods. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected, ART-eligible children were enrolled into 2 cohorts based on prior NVP exposure and randomized to NVP- or LPV/r-based ART. The data safety monitoring board recommended unblinding results in both cohorts due to superiority of LPV/r for the primary endpoint: stopping randomized treatment, virologic failure (VF), or death by 6 months. Participants were offered a switch in regimens (if on NVP) and continued observational follow-up. We compared time to VF or death, death, and CD4% and growth changes using intention-to-treat analyses. Additionally, inverse probability weights were used to account for treatment switching and censoring. Results. As of September 2014, 329 of the 451 (73%) enrolled participants were still in follow-up (median, 5.3 years; interquartile range [IQR], 4.3-6.4), with 52% on NVP and 88% on LPV/r as originally randomized. NVP arm participants had significantly higher risk of VF or death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.65) but not death alone (aHR, 1.65; 95% CI,. 72-3.76) compared with participants randomized to LPV/r. Mean CD4% was significantly higher in the NVP arm up to 1 year after ART initiation, but not beyond. Mean weight-for-age z scores were marginally higher in the NVP arm, but height-for-age z scores did not differ. Similar trends were observed in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. These findings support the current World Health Organization recommendation of LPV/r in first-line ART regimens for HIV-infected children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1113-1121
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume63
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2016

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral therapy
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Long-term follow-up
  • Pediatrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nevirapine- Versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Infants and Young Children: Long-term Follow-up of the IMPAACT P1060 Randomized Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this