Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Neurosensory Screening and Symptom Provocation in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

  • Bruce Caplan
  • , Jennifer Bogner
  • , Lisa Brenner
  • , James Malec
  • , Andrew R. Mayer
  • , Christopher J. Wertz
  • , Cidney R. Robertson-Benta
  • , Sharvani Pabbathi Reddy
  • , David D. Stephenson
  • , Andrew B. Dodd
  • , Scott J. Oglesbee
  • , Edward J. Bedrick
  • , Christina L. Master
  • , Mathew Grady
  • , Nicholas A. Shaff
  • , Faith M. Hanlon
  • , Richard A. Campbell
  • , John P. Phillips
  • , Roger L. Zemek
  • , Keith Owen Yeates
  • Timothy B. Meier, Rebekah Mannix, John J. Leddy, Kristy B. Arbogast, Grace Park
  • Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute
  • University of New Mexico
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • University of Arizona
  • Center for Injury Research and Prevention
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Calgary
  • Boston Children's Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate diagnostic/prognostic implications of neurosensory testing during the subacute stage in patients with pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI). Setting: Recruitment from pediatric emergency department and urgent care clinics, assessment in a controlled environment. Participants: In total, 146 pmTBI patients evaluated 7.4 ± 2.3 days and approximately 4 months postinjury; 104 age/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) at equivalent time points. Design: Prospective cohort study. Main Measures: Neurosensory examination based on sequence of 10 established tests of vestibular-ocular, oculomotor, vestibulospinal, and visual functioning. Results: The amount of symptom provocation (positive change from pretest symptomatology) was significantly increased in pmTBI relative to HCs on every subtest 1 week postinjury, as were deficits in monocular accommodative amplitude and King-Devick Test errors. However, symptom provocation did not meaningfully alter diagnostic sensitivity/specificity relative to more easily obtained pretest symptom ratings. Evidence of clinically significant symptom provocation 1 week postinjury improved sensitivity (Δ = +12.9%) of identifying patients with persistent postconcussive symptoms 4 months postinjury on an independent symptom measure. Conclusions: The diagnostic sensitivity/specificity of neurosensory testing in acutely concussed youth may be limited at 1 week postinjury as a function of natural recovery occurring in most emergency department cohorts. Neurosensory screening may have greater utility for identifying patients who experience delayed recovery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)270-278
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

Keywords

  • assessment
  • concussion
  • ocular motor
  • recovery
  • vestibular
  • vision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neurosensory Screening and Symptom Provocation in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this