Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Modifications of the empirical likelihood interval estimation with improved coverage probabilities

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

The empirical likelihood (EL) technique has been well addressed in both the theoretical and applied literature in the context of powerful nonparametric statistical methods for testing and interval estimations. A nonparametric version of Wilks theorem (Wilks, 1938) can usually provide an asymptotic evaluation of the Type I error of EL ratio-type tests. In this article, we examine the performance of this asymptotic result when the EL is based on finite samples that are from various distributions. In the context of the Type I error control, we show that the classical EL procedure and the Student's t-test have asymptotically a similar structure. Thus, we conclude that modifications of t-type tests can be adopted to improve the EL ratio test. We propose the application of the Chen (1995) t-test modification to the EL ratio test. We display that the Chen approach leads to a location change of observed data whereas the classical Bartlett method is known to be a scale correction of the data distribution. Finally, we modify the EL ratio test via both the Chen and Bartlett corrections. We support our argument with theoretical proofs as well as a Monte Carlo study. A real data example studies the proposed approach in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2171-2183
Number of pages13
JournalCommunications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Keywords

  • Bartlett Correction
  • Empirical likelihood
  • Interval estimation
  • Likelihood ratio
  • Modified t-test
  • Nonparametric test
  • Significance level
  • Type I error

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modifications of the empirical likelihood interval estimation with improved coverage probabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this