TY - JOUR
T1 - Moderate-high efficacy disease-modifying therapies reduce relapse risk in late-onset multiple sclerosis
AU - Foong, Yi Chao
AU - Merlo, Daniel
AU - Gresle, Melissa
AU - Buzzard, Katherine
AU - Horakova, Dana
AU - Havrdova, Eva Kubala
AU - Kalincik, Tomas
AU - Roos, Izanne
AU - Hodgkinson, Suzanne
AU - Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
AU - Lugaresi, Alessandra
AU - Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca
AU - Ozakbas, Serkan
AU - Surcinelli, Andrea
AU - Foschi, Matteo
AU - Boz, Cavit
AU - Khoury, Samia Joseph
AU - Yamout, Bassem
AU - Laureys, Guy
AU - Blanco, Yolanda
AU - Skibina, Olga
AU - Kuhle, Jens
AU - John, Nevin
AU - Alroughani, Raed
AU - Prevost, Julie
AU - Van Pesch, Vincent
AU - Tomassini, Valentina
AU - Prat, Alexandre
AU - Girard, Marc
AU - Terzi, Murat
AU - Shaygannejad, Vahid
AU - Ampapa, Radek
AU - Gray, Orla
AU - Etemadifar, Masoud
AU - Guimarães, Joana
AU - Mccombe, Pamela A.
AU - Gerlach, Oliver
AU - Solaro, Claudio
AU - Butzkueven, Helmut
AU - Zhu, Chao
AU - Van Der Walt, Anneke
AU - Study Group, MSBase
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Author(s) (or their employer(s)).
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Introduction Late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS) now comprises over 10% of MS diagnoses in contemporary cohorts. The effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in LOMS is unclear. We aimed to establish the comparative effectiveness of moderate-high-efficacy versus low-efficacy DMTs in LOMS. Methods Using data from the MSBase registry, this multicentre cohort study included people with MS with symptom onset after age 50. Covariates were balanced using inverse-probability-treatment-weighting (IPTW). Primary outcomes were time to first relapse and annualised relapse rate (ARR). Secondary outcomes were 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP), confirmed disability improvement (CDI), relapse-associated worsening (RAW) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Results Of 1032 participants, 472 received moderate-high-efficacy DMTs and 560 received low-efficacy DMTs. IPTW-weighted ARR was 0.06 for moderate-high-efficacy and 0.09 for low-efficacy DMTs, corresponding to an ARR ratio of 0.68 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.93, p=0.01). HR for time to first relapse was 0.66 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.91, p=0.01) in favour of moderate-high-efficacy DMTs. Among 856 participants with adequate follow-up, 37% experienced CDP over a median of 4.43 years, with most events (83.6%) attributable to PIRA. The HR for time to CDP was 0.78 (p=0.08) and RAW was 0.69 (p=0.31) in favour of moderate-high-efficacy DMTs, though neither reached statistical significance. There was no difference in CDI or PIRA. Conclusion Moderate-high-efficacy DMTs reduced relapse risk in LOMS. Relapse activity was low. CDP was common and driven by PIRA. Although the CDP and RAW results did not reach statistical significance, the overall findings support the initial use of moderate-high-efficacy DMTs in LOMS.
AB - Introduction Late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS) now comprises over 10% of MS diagnoses in contemporary cohorts. The effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in LOMS is unclear. We aimed to establish the comparative effectiveness of moderate-high-efficacy versus low-efficacy DMTs in LOMS. Methods Using data from the MSBase registry, this multicentre cohort study included people with MS with symptom onset after age 50. Covariates were balanced using inverse-probability-treatment-weighting (IPTW). Primary outcomes were time to first relapse and annualised relapse rate (ARR). Secondary outcomes were 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP), confirmed disability improvement (CDI), relapse-associated worsening (RAW) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Results Of 1032 participants, 472 received moderate-high-efficacy DMTs and 560 received low-efficacy DMTs. IPTW-weighted ARR was 0.06 for moderate-high-efficacy and 0.09 for low-efficacy DMTs, corresponding to an ARR ratio of 0.68 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.93, p=0.01). HR for time to first relapse was 0.66 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.91, p=0.01) in favour of moderate-high-efficacy DMTs. Among 856 participants with adequate follow-up, 37% experienced CDP over a median of 4.43 years, with most events (83.6%) attributable to PIRA. The HR for time to CDP was 0.78 (p=0.08) and RAW was 0.69 (p=0.31) in favour of moderate-high-efficacy DMTs, though neither reached statistical significance. There was no difference in CDI or PIRA. Conclusion Moderate-high-efficacy DMTs reduced relapse risk in LOMS. Relapse activity was low. CDP was common and driven by PIRA. Although the CDP and RAW results did not reach statistical significance, the overall findings support the initial use of moderate-high-efficacy DMTs in LOMS.
KW - DEMYELINATING DISEASES
KW - GERIATRICS
KW - MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
KW - STATISTICS
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023643089
U2 - 10.1136/jnnp-2025-336513
DO - 10.1136/jnnp-2025-336513
M3 - Article
C2 - 41161724
AN - SCOPUS:105023643089
SN - 0022-3050
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
M1 - jnnp-2025-336513
ER -