Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression

  • Ricardo Teles
  • , Habtamu K. Benecha
  • , John S. Preisser
  • , Kevin Moss
  • , Jacqueline R. Starr
  • , Patricia Corby
  • , Robert Genco
  • , Nathalia Garcia
  • , William V. Giannobile
  • , Heather Jared
  • , Gay Torresyap
  • , Elida Salazar
  • , Julie Moya
  • , Cynthia Howard
  • , Robert Schifferle
  • , Karen L. Falkner
  • , Jane Gillespie
  • , Debra Dixon
  • , Maryann Cugini
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • The Forsyth Institute
  • Harvard University
  • New York University
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Southern Illinois University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Rho, Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim The goal of this study was to identify progressing periodontal sites by applying linear mixed models (LMM) to longitudinal measurements of clinical attachment loss (CAL). Methods Ninety-three periodontally healthy and 236 periodontitis subjects had their CAL measured bi-monthly for 12 months. The proportions of sites demonstrating increases in CAL from baseline above specified thresholds were calculated for each visit. The proportions of sites reversing from the progressing state were also computed. LMM were fitted for each tooth site and the predicted CAL levels used to categorize sites regarding progression or regression. The threshold for progression was established based on the model-estimated error in predictions. Results Over 12 months, 21.2%, 2.8% and 0.3% of sites progressed, according to thresholds of 1, 2 and 3 mm of CAL increase. However, on average, 42.0%, 64.4% and 77.7% of progressing sites for the different thresholds reversed in subsequent visits. Conversely, 97.1%, 76.9% and 23.1% of sites classified as progressing using LMM had observed CAL increases above 1, 2 and 3 mm after 12 months, whereas mean rates of reversal were 10.6%, 30.2% and 53.0% respectively. Conclusion LMM accounted for several sources of error in longitudinal CAL measurement, providing an improved method for classifying progressing sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)426-434
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Keywords

  • clinical attachment loss
  • disease progression
  • linear mixed models
  • periodontal disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling changes in clinical attachment loss to classify periodontal disease progression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this