Abstract
In order to explore whether the WatermarkTM Educator Disposition Assessment (EDA) is an equitable assessment for all teacher candidates regardless of race, this study used a Quantitative Critical Race Theory (QuantCrit) methodological design to analyze a pilot implementation of the assessment representing 650 discreet disposition assessments undertaken in 24 designated courses in five distinct programs of educator preparation at a midsized Midwestern university. Chi-square analysis and descriptive statistics from fall 2019–spring 2020 archival data indicate a statistically significant association between the variable race and the average scores assigned to students in multiple EDA assessments, with marked disadvantages for Black teacher candidates. Through this analysis and a careful and critical review of language embedded in each rubric row, the authors argue that the WatermarkTM EDA advances and reifies a set of normative practices that align with dominant White, middle-class cultural values under the guise of objectivity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 475-503 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Educational Studies - AESA |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Missing the Mark: Assessing Dispositions and the Reification of Whiteness in Teacher Preparation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver