Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Missing the Mark: Assessing Dispositions and the Reification of Whiteness in Teacher Preparation

  • Regina J. Giraldo-García
  • , Eva Zygmunt
  • , Kristin N. Cipollone
  • , Sheron Fraser-Burgess
  • , Michael Takafor Ndemanu
  • , John Ambrosio
  • Ball State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In order to explore whether the WatermarkTM Educator Disposition Assessment (EDA) is an equitable assessment for all teacher candidates regardless of race, this study used a Quantitative Critical Race Theory (QuantCrit) methodological design to analyze a pilot implementation of the assessment representing 650 discreet disposition assessments undertaken in 24 designated courses in five distinct programs of educator preparation at a midsized Midwestern university. Chi-square analysis and descriptive statistics from fall 2019–spring 2020 archival data indicate a statistically significant association between the variable race and the average scores assigned to students in multiple EDA assessments, with marked disadvantages for Black teacher candidates. Through this analysis and a careful and critical review of language embedded in each rubric row, the authors argue that the WatermarkTM EDA advances and reifies a set of normative practices that align with dominant White, middle-class cultural values under the guise of objectivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-503
Number of pages29
JournalEducational Studies - AESA
Volume59
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Missing the Mark: Assessing Dispositions and the Reification of Whiteness in Teacher Preparation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this