Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Middle architecture criteria

  • SUNY Buffalo
  • National Center for Ontological Research
  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Mid-level ontologies are used to integrate data across disparate domains using vocabularies more specific than top-level ontologies and more general than domain-level ontologies. There are no clear, defensible criteria for determining whether a given ontology should count as mid-level, because we lack a rigorous characterization of what the middle level of generality is supposed to contain. Attempts to provide such a characterization have failed, we believe, because they have focused on the goal of specifying what is characteristic of those single ontologies that have been advanced as mid-level ontologies. Unfortunately, single ontologies of this sort are generally a mixture of top- and mid-level, and sometimes even of domain-level terms. To gain clarity, we aim to specify conditions for membership in what we call the middle architecture, which consists solely of mid-level ontologies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume3882
StatePublished - 2024
Event2024 Joint Ontology Workshops - Episode X: The Tukker Zomer of Ontology, and Satellite Events, JOWO 2024 - Enschede, Netherlands
Duration: Jul 15 2024Jul 19 2024

Keywords

  • Common Core Ontologies
  • Methodological Issues
  • Mid-Level Ontology
  • Middle Architecture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Middle architecture criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this