Abstract
Mid-level ontologies are used to integrate data across disparate domains using vocabularies more specific than top-level ontologies and more general than domain-level ontologies. There are no clear, defensible criteria for determining whether a given ontology should count as mid-level, because we lack a rigorous characterization of what the middle level of generality is supposed to contain. Attempts to provide such a characterization have failed, we believe, because they have focused on the goal of specifying what is characteristic of those single ontologies that have been advanced as mid-level ontologies. Unfortunately, single ontologies of this sort are generally a mixture of top- and mid-level, and sometimes even of domain-level terms. To gain clarity, we aim to specify conditions for membership in what we call the middle architecture, which consists solely of mid-level ontologies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
| Volume | 3882 |
| State | Published - 2024 |
| Event | 2024 Joint Ontology Workshops - Episode X: The Tukker Zomer of Ontology, and Satellite Events, JOWO 2024 - Enschede, Netherlands Duration: Jul 15 2024 → Jul 19 2024 |
Keywords
- Common Core Ontologies
- Methodological Issues
- Mid-Level Ontology
- Middle Architecture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Middle architecture criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver