Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Microfinance participation and contraceptive use: Does control over resources matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The purpose of the present study was to assess the association between microfinance and contraceptive use. A secondary purpose of the study was to assess the role of control over resources between microfinance participation and contraceptive use. Method Using secondary data from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011 the present study conducted logistic regression analysis to estimate the interaction effect of microfinance participation and control over resources on reported contraceptive use. Results Findings indicate that microfinance participants are 1.69 times more likely to use contraceptive (P < 0.001), and women with control over resources are 4.28 times more likely to use contraceptive (P < 0.001). However, the interaction effect of microfinance participation and control over resources suggest that microfinance participants with control over resources are less likely to use contraceptive, but that finding is not significant. Conclusion While control over resources matter the most in terms of women's use of contraceptive, this does not hold true for microfinance participants with control over resources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e27-e32
JournalJournal of Public Health
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Keywords

  • Bangladesh
  • contraceptive use
  • control over resources
  • micro-entrepreneurship
  • microfinance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microfinance participation and contraceptive use: Does control over resources matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this