Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Methodology for the American Society of Hematology VTE guidelines: Current best practice, innovations, and experiences

  • Wojtek Wiercioch
  • , Robby Nieuwlaat
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , Robert Kunkle
  • , Kendall E. Alexander
  • , Adam Cuker
  • , Anita Rajasekhar
  • , Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • , David R. Anderson
  • , Shannon M. Bates
  • , Mary Cushman
  • , Philipp Dahm
  • , Gordon Guyatt
  • , Alfonso Iorio
  • , Wendy Lim
  • , Gary H. Lyman
  • , Saskia Middeldorp
  • , Paul Monagle
  • , Reem A. Mustafa
  • , Ignacio Neumann
  • Thomas L. Ortel, Bram Rochwerg, Nancy Santesso, Sara K. Vesely, Daniel M. Witt, Holger J. Schünemann
  • McMaster University
  • American University of Beirut
  • American Society of Hematology
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Florida
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédicaen Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
  • Dalhousie University
  • University of Vermont
  • Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of Washington
  • University of Amsterdam
  • University of Melbourne
  • Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • University of Kansas
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Duke University
  • University of Oklahoma
  • University of Utah

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Methods for the development of clinical guidelines have advanced dramatically over the past 2 decades to strive for trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) have followed these advances, together with application of methodological innovations. Objective: In this article, we describe methods and methodological innovations as a model to inform future guideline enterprises by ASH and others to achieve guideline standards. Methodological innovations introduced in the development of the guidelines aim to address current challenges in guideline development. Methods: We followed ASH policy for guideline development, which is based on the Guideline International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and current best practices. Central coordination, specialist working groups, and expert panels were established for the development of 10 VTE guidelines. Methodological guidance resources were developed to guide the process across guidelines panels. A methods advisory group guided the development and implementation of methodological innovations to address emerging challenges and needs. Results: The complete set of VTE guidelines will include.250 recommendations. Methodological innovations include the use of health-outcome descriptors, online voting with guideline development software, modeling of pathways for diagnostic questions, application of expert evidence, and a template manuscript for publication of ASH guidelines. These methods advance guideline development standards and have already informed other ASH guideline projects. Conclusions: The development of the ASH VTE guidelines followed rigorous methods and introduced methodological innovations during guideline development, striving for the highest possible level of trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2351-2365
Number of pages15
JournalBlood Advances
Volume4
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 26 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodology for the American Society of Hematology VTE guidelines: Current best practice, innovations, and experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this