Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging study of glenohumeral relationships between genders

  • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: During glenohumeral arthroplasty, not only should the dimensions of the prosthesis match the normal anatomy but also the relationship of the humeral head-greater tuberosity and humeral head inclination should be replicated to avoid muscular dysfunction. To date there is no evidence whether fit could be optimized with gender-specific prostheses. Materials and methods: Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography imaging was used to evaluate 81 proximal humeral scans for 5 different anatomic parameters. The study group included 41 men and 40 women, aged 20 to 62 years. Anatomic parameters, including the humeral head height, humeral head width, humeral head-greater tuberosity distance, humeral head inclination, and glenoid version were measured using Horizon Rad Station 11.0 to evaluate the MR imaging. Results: The humeral head height, width, and distance to the greater tuberosity were significantly different in size between genders. However, none of the anatomic relationships were different. The humeral head-greater tuberosity distance significantly correlated with the humeral head inclination in both men (r = 0.338; P < .05) and women (r = 0.448; P < .005). Conclusion: We conclude that there are no significant differences in glenohumeral relationships between genders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1335-1339
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume20
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Anatomic Study
  • Anatomy
  • Arthroplasty
  • Basic Science Study
  • Gender
  • Glenohumeral
  • Imaging
  • MRA
  • MRI
  • Shoulder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnetic resonance imaging study of glenohumeral relationships between genders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this