Abstract
A low-frequency response analysis of three Grass model 7 polygraphs was undertaken. Observed error was generally found to fall within the manufacturer's stated range of +5 to -10% of DC signal height over the frequency range of human respiration (0.1-3 Hz), but this was not the case for frequencies >6 Hz under certain circumstances. The magnitude of error was seen to vary directly with frequency and indirectly with pen-deflection amplitude and paper speed. The pen-oscillograph apparatus was the predominant source of low-frequency error, and this is probably due to pen inertia and pen friction on the writing surface. Two schemes to reduce such error are presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1026-1030 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Physiology |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1985 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Low-frequency response characteristics of three Grass model 7 polygraphs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver