Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Letters, numbers, symbols and words: How to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

287 Scopus citations

Abstract

THE GRADE WORKING GROUP IS DEVELOPING and evaluating a common, sensible approach to grading of evidence and strength of recommendations in health care. In this article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using letters, numbers, symbols or words to represent grades of evidence and recommendations. Using multiple strategies, we searched for comparative studies of alternative ways of representing ordered categories in any context. In addition, we contacted experts and reviewed theoretical work and qualitative research on how best to communicate grades of any kind quickly and clearly. We were unable to identify health care research that addressed, either directly or indirectly, the best way to present grades of evidence and recommendations. We found examples of symbols used by government, commercial and consumer organizations to communicate quality of evidence or strength of recommendations, but no comparative studies. Although a number of grading systems are used in health care and other fields, there is little or no evidence of how well various presentations are understood. Before promoting the use of specific symbols, numbers, letters or words, the extent to which the intended message is comprehended should be evaluated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)677-680
Number of pages4
JournalCMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
Volume169
Issue number7
StatePublished - Sep 30 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Letters, numbers, symbols and words: How to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this