Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kids's slips: What young children's slips of the tongue reveal about language development

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study of speech errors, or "slips of the tongue," is a time-honored methodology which serves as a window to the representation and processing of language and has proven to be the most reliable source of data for building theories of speech production planning. However, until Kids' Slips, there has never been a corpus of such errors from children with which to work. This is the first developmental linguistics research volume to document how online processing is revealed in young children, ages 18 months through 5 years, through their slips of the tongue. Thus, this text provides a new methodology and data source, which will greatly expand our ability to uncover the details of early language development. Professor Jaeger's groundbreaking book incorporates both details of her methodology and findings with implications for different aspects of language development, including phonetics and phonology, the lexicon, semantics, morphology, and syntax. While all the child data is included in the book, a Web site hosted by the author provides readers with the adult data as well. Kids' Slips targets those who study language development in linguistics, developmental psychology, and speech and hearing, as well as those who study language representation and processing more generally in the same disciplines.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationKids' Slips
Subtitle of host publicationWhat Young Children's Slips of the Tongue Reveal About Language Development
PublisherLawrence Erlbaum Associates
Pages1-726
Number of pages726
ISBN (Print)1410611558, 9781410611550
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kids's slips: What young children's slips of the tongue reveal about language development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this