Abstract
How courts communicate, whether to political elites or the general public, has important implications for their ability to effectively fulfill judicial functions in the face of concerns like judicial legitimacy and compliance. Around the world, courts have adopted a variety of strategies and tactics to connect with their audiences, with varying degrees of success and efficacy. In this chapter, I work from a comparative perspective to focus on two key forms of judicial communication: the use of procedures like oral arguments and institutional developments like the establishment of media relations offices and the use of digital communication. I briefly conclude the chapter with a discussion of two considerations for future research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research Handbook on Judicial Politics |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. |
| Pages | 321-336 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781035309320 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781035309313 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2024 |
Keywords
- Comparative judicial politics
- Judicial communication
- Judicial proceedings
- Media relations
- Oral arguments
- Social media
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial communication beyond the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver