Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is Self-Reported Height or Arm Span a More Accurate Alternative Measure of Height?

  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Ohio State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether self-reported height or arm span is the more accurate alternative measure of height. A sample of 409 people between the ages of 19 and 67 (M = 35.0) participated in this anthropometric study. Height, self-reported height, and arm span were measured by 82 nursing research students. Mean differences from criterion measures were 0.17 cm for the measuring rules, 0.47 cm for arm span, and 0.85 cm and 0.87 cm for heights. Test-retest reliability was r =.997 for both height and arm span. The relationships of height to self-reported height and arm span were r =.97 and.90, respectively. Mean absolute differences were 1.80 cm and 4.29 cm, respectively. These findings support the practice of using self-reported height as an alternative measure of measured height in clinical settings, but arm span is an accurate alternative when neither measured height nor self-reported height is obtainable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-432
Number of pages16
JournalClinical Nursing Research
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Self-Reported Height or Arm Span a More Accurate Alternative Measure of Height?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this