Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is passive drag dependent on the interaction of kayak design and paddler weight in flat-water kayaking?

  • Beatriz B. Gomes
  • , Filipe A.V. Conceição
  • , David R. Pendergast
  • , Ross H. Sanders
  • , Mário A.P. Vaz
  • , João Paulo Vilas-Boas
  • University of Porto
  • The University of Sydney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Drag is one of the major factors that influences kayaking performance. To focus on the drag of the kayak’s hull shape and the paddlers’ weight per se, the passive drag (Dp) was measured on a flat-water sprint course for one paddler with added weights. Dp was measured by an electromechanical towing device using a load cell, at incremental and constant velocities from 2.78 to 5.56 m/s. Three kayaks of different sizes and shapes (Nelo® K1 Quattro-M, ML, and L) were used and the paddlers’ body weight was adjusted with weights so the total paddler weight in the kayak was 65, 75, and 85 kg. The mean Dp increased by the power function of D = kvn (mean R2 = .990; SD.006). The Dp went from 21.37 ± 1.29 N at 2.78 m/s to 89.32 ± 6.43 N at 5.56 m/s. For the two lighter weighted kayaks (65 and 75 kg), the lowest Dp was observed with different kayak sizes (M, ML, or L) depending on the target velocity. The manufacturers suggest that paddlers should select a kayak size according to their body weight to minimise drag; however, the results of this study suggest that target velocities, and thus competition distance should also be factored into kayak selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)394-403
Number of pages10
JournalSports Biomechanics
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2015

Keywords

  • hull
  • Hydrodynamics
  • single-seat kayak

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is passive drag dependent on the interaction of kayak design and paddler weight in flat-water kayaking?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this