Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017)

  • A. Younes
  • , P. Hilden
  • , B. Coiffier
  • , A. Hagenbeek
  • , G. Salles
  • , W. Wilson
  • , J. F. Seymour
  • , K. Kelly
  • , J. Gribben
  • , M. Pfreunschuh
  • , F. Morschhauser
  • , H. Schoder
  • , A. D. Zelenetz
  • , J. Rademaker
  • , R. Advani
  • , N. Valente
  • , C. Fortpied
  • , T. E. Witzig
  • , L. H. Sehn
  • , A. Engert
  • R. I. Fisher, P. L. Zinzani, M. Federico, M. Hutchings, C. Bollard, M. Trneny, Y. A. Elsayed, K. Tobinai, J. S. Abramson, N. Fowler, A. Goy, M. Smith, S. Ansell, J. Kuruvilla, M. Dreyling, C. Thieblemont, R. F. Little, I. Aurer, M. H.J. Van Oers, K. Takeshita, A. Gopal, S. Rule, S. de Vos, I. Kloos, M. S. Kaminski, M. Meignan, L. H. Schwartz, J. P. Leonard, S. J. Schuster, V. E. Seshan
  • Lymphoma Service
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • University of Amsterdam
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Saarland University
  • Université de Lille
  • Stanford University
  • Genentech, Inc
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • University of Cologne
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • University of Bologna
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Children's National Medical Center
  • Charles University
  • Spring House
  • National Cancer Center Japan
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • University Health Network
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Université Paris Cité
  • University of Zagreb
  • Amsterdam University Medical Center
  • Celgene Corporation
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of Plymouth
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Institut de Recherches Servier
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Hôpital Henri Mondor
  • Columbia University
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • University of Pennsylvania

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

322 Scopus citations

Abstract

In recent years, the number of approved and investigational agents that can be safely administered for the treatment of lymphoma patients for a prolonged period of time has substantially increased. Many of these novel agents are evaluated in early-phase clinical trials in patients with a wide range of malignancies, including solid tumors and lymphoma. Furthermore, with the advances in genome sequencing, new “basket” clinical trial designs have emerged that select patients based on the presence of specific genetic alterations across different types of solid tumors and lymphoma. The standard response criteria currently in use for lymphoma are the Lugano Criteria which are based on [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography or bidimensional tumor measurements on computerized tomography scans. These differ from the RECIST criteria used in solid tumors, which use unidimensional measurements. The RECIL group hypothesized that single-dimension measurement could be used to assess response to therapy in lymphoma patients, producing results similar to the standard criteria. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing 47 828 imaging measurements from 2983 individual adult and pediatric lymphoma patients enrolled on 10 multicenter clinical trials and developed new lymphoma response criteria (RECIL 2017). We demonstrate that assessment of tumor burden in lymphoma clinical trials can use the sum of longest diameters of a maximum of three target lesions. Furthermore, we introduced a new provisional category of a minor response. We also clarified response assessment in patients receiving novel immune therapy and targeted agents that generate unique imaging situations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1436-1447
Number of pages12
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

Keywords

  • FDG-PET
  • immunotherapy
  • lymphoma
  • response criteria
  • targeted therapy
  • waterfall plots

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this