Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment

  • George Mason University
  • University of Oregon
  • Michigan State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

During lexical access, listeners use both signal-based and knowledge-based cues, and information from the linguistic context can affect the perception of acoustic speech information. Recent findings suggest that the various cues used in lexical access are implemented with flexibility and may be affected by information from the larger speech context. We conducted 2 experiments to examine effects of a signal-based cue (distal speech rate) and a knowledge-based cue (linguistic structure) on lexical perception. In Experiment 1, we manipulated distal speech rate in utterances where an acoustically ambiguous critical word was either obligatory for the utterance to be syntactically well formed (e.g., Conner knew that bread and butter (are) both in the pantry) or optional (e.g., Don must see the harbor (or) boats). In Experiment 2, we examined identical target utterances as in Experiment 1 but changed the distribution of linguistic structures in the fillers. The results of the 2 experiments demonstrate that speech rate and linguistic knowledge about critical word obligatoriness can both influence speech perception. In addition, it is possible to alter the strength of a signal-based cue by changing information in the speech environment. These results provide support for models of word segmentation that include flexible weighting of signal-based and knowledge-based cues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1451-1457
Number of pages7
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 26 2015

Keywords

  • Speech perception
  • Speech rate
  • Spoken word recognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this