Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

INHALE-1: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin in Children With Type 1 Diabetes

  • INHALE-1 Study Group
  • University of Florida
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Sutter Valley Medical Foundation Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Obesity
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Joslin Diabetes Center
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • University of Iowa
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • AM Diabetes and Endocrinology Center
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Diabetes and Glandular Disease Clinic
  • University of South Florida
  • Rocky Mountain Inst. of Clinical Research
  • University of Oklahoma
  • Seattle Children’s Research Institute
  • Rady Children's Hospital
  • Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Emory University
  • University of Louisville
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Stanford University
  • Michigan Pediatric Endocrine & Diabetes Services
  • Nemours Children's Specialty Care
  • DHR Health Institute for Research and Development
  • Yale University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • New York University
  • Children’s Mercy
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Advent Health
  • MD LLC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate inhaled technosphere insulin (TI) in children with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 230 youth 4–17 years old with type 1 (98%) or type 2 (2%) diabetes treated with multiple daily injections of insulin were randomly assigned 1:1 to TI or rapid-acting analog (RAA) insulin plus continuation of long-acting basal insulin and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c, tested for noninferiority with margin of 0.4%. RESULTS In intent-to-treat analysis, mean HbA1c (% ± SD) was 8.22 ± 0.87 at baseline and 8.41 ± 1.38 at 26 weeks with TI and 8.21 ± 0.96 and 8.21 ± 1.10, respectively, with RAA (adjusted difference = 0.18; 95% CI −0.07, 0.43; noninferiority P = 0.091). CGM-measured time in range 70–180 mg/dL was not significantly different between groups (adjusted difference −2.2%; 95% CI −7.0, 2.7; P = 0.38). Two severe hypoglycemic events occurred in the TI group and one in the RAA group. Change in forced expiration volume in 1 s from baseline to 26 weeks did not differ comparing TI and RAA (P = 0.53). The TI group reported greater treatment satisfaction (P = 0.004) and had less gain in weight and BMI percentile (P = 0.009) than did the RAA group. CONCLUSIONS The primary analysis did not meet the prespecified criteria for HbA1c noninferiority. However, TI use was safe over 26 weeks without affecting pulmonary function and was associated with greater treatment satisfaction and less weight gain compared with RAA, supporting TI as a treatment option for some pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-187
Number of pages9
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'INHALE-1: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin in Children With Type 1 Diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this