Abstract
In situations when digital systems exacerbate bias and injustice, who should be held responsible? Who is in a position to respond effectively? This poster 1) critiques dominant rhetoric concerning responsibility and the ability to respond to the influence of digital information systems; 2) argues for the field of information science to contribute to this discussion beyond a focus on policy; and 3) calls for information scientists to draw upon and extend information practice scholarship by applying it as a generative lens for conceptualizing responsibility in relation to ethical data stewardship.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 837-838 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- Information Policy
- Information Practice
- Networked Systems
- Practice Theory
- Responsibility
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Information practice, responsibility, and the ability to respond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver