Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Individual differences in the classification of stimuli by dimensions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2 experiments, 8 graduates and 24 undergraduates differing in general mental abilities (Raven Progressive Matrices) were given multidimensional classification tasks: aural and visual free-classification tasks that allowed grouping of triads or tetrads by conflicting criteria of dimensional identity or overall similarity, and a speeded classification task that required the filtering of variation in an irrelevant dimension. Four principal results are reported: (a) Individual differences in the tendency to use similarity criteria in free classification were systematic across modalities and stimulus dimensions; (b) filtering performance, measured as the effect of irrelevant variation on speeded classification, did not correlate with free-classification performance (percent similarity responses); (c) the tendency to use similarity criteria in free classification was not correlated with intelligence; and (d) the amount of interference in speeded classification was correlated negatively with intelligence. Results suggest that there are 2 dimensions of individual differences in perceptual analysis, one having to do with ability and the other with style or preference. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1132-1145
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1981

Keywords

  • aural vs visual mode, individual differences in free vs speeded classification of stimuli by dimension, college &
  • graduate students
  • intelligence &

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in the classification of stimuli by dimensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this