Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incidence and significance of neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis

  • Richard A. Rudick
  • , N. A. Simonian
  • , J. A. Alam
  • , M. Campion
  • , J. O. Scaramucci
  • , W. Jones
  • , M. E. Coats
  • , D. E. Goodkin
  • , B. Weinstock-Guttman
  • , R. M. Herndon
  • , M. K. Mass
  • , J. R. Richert
  • , A. M. Salazar
  • , F. E. Munschauer
  • , D. L. Cookfair
  • , J. H. Simon
  • , L. D. Jacobs
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Biogen IDEC
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • VA Medical Center
  • Legacy Clinical Research and Technology Center
  • Georgetown University
  • Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

320 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Interferon beta is an effective treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). As with other protein drugs, neutralizing antibodies (NAB) can develop that reduce the effectiveness of treatment. Objectives: To determine the incidence and biological significance of NAB to interferon beta-1a (IFN-β-1a; Avonex; Biogen, Cambridge, MA) in MS patients. Methods: A two-step assay for NAB to IFN-β-1a was developed and used to assay serum samples from participants in the phase III clinical trial of IFN-β-1a, and from patients in an ongoing open-label study of IFN-β-1a. The biological significance of NAB to IFN-β-1a was determined by relating the NAB assay result to in vivo induction of the IFN-inducible molecules neopterin and β- 2 microglobulin, and the clinical significance was determined by comparing clinical and MRI measures of disease activity after 2 years of IFN-β-1a therapy in patients who were NAB+ and NAB-. The incidence of NAB was compared in MS patients who had used only IFN-β-1a with the incidence in MS patients who had used only IFN-β-1b. Results: In patients in the open-label study, development of NAB to IFN-β-1a resulted in a titer-dependent reduction in neopterin induction after interferon injections. In patients in the phase III study, development of NAB was associated with a reduction in β-2 microglobulin induction. In the phase III study, a trend toward reduced benefit of IFN-β-1a on MRI activity in NAB+ versus NAB- patients was observed. The incidence of NAB to IFN-β-1a in the open-label study was approximately 5% over 24 months of treatment of IFN-β-1a therapy, but was four- to sixfold higher using the same assay for patients exposed only to IFN-β-lb for a similar duration. There were no clinical, MRI, or CSF characteristics that were predictive of which patients would develop NAB. Conclusions: NAB directed against IFN-β have in vivo biological consequences in patients with MS. The frequency with which MS patients develop NAB against IFN-β is significantly greater with IFN-β-1b therapy compared with IFN-β- la therapy. Treatment decisions in MS patients treated with IFN-β should take into account development of NAB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1266-1272
Number of pages7
JournalNeurology
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence and significance of neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this