Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Life table analysis and clinical relevance

  • Brajesh K. Lal
  • , Robert W. Hobson
  • , Jonathan Goldstein
  • , Madge Geohagan
  • , Elie Chakhtoura
  • , Peter J. Pappas
  • , Zafar Jamil
  • , Paul B. Haser
  • , Shubha Varma
  • , Frank T. Padberg
  • , Joaquim J. Cerveira
  • , Daniel Clair
  • , Ali F. AbuRahma
  • , Bruce Perler
  • , Luis A. Queral
  • , Linda Harris
  • , Kenneth Ouriel
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Newark
  • St. Michaels Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

149 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Carotid artery stenting has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy in cerebral revascularization. Although early results from several centers have been encouraging, concerns remain regarding long-term durability of carotid artery stenting. We report the incidence, characteristics, and management of in-stent recurrent stenosis after long-term follow-up of carotid artery stenting. Methods: Carotid artery stenting (n = 122) was performed in 118 patients between September 1996 and March 2003. Indications included recurrent stenosis after previous carotid endarterectomy (66%), primary lesions in patients at high-risk (29%), and previous ipsilateral cervical radiation therapy (5%). Fifty-five percent of patients had asymptomatic stenosis; 45% had symptomatic lesions. Each patient was followed up with serial duplex ultrasound scanning. Selective angiography and repeat intervention were performed when duplex ultrasound scans demonstrated 80% or greater in-stent recurrent stenosis. Data were prospectively recorded, and were statistically analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: Carotid artery stenting was performed successfully in all cases, with the WallStent or Acculink carotid stent. Thirty-day stroke and death rate was 3.3%, attributable to retinal infarction (n = 1), hemispheric stroke (n = 1), and death (n = 2). Over follow-up of 1 to 74 months (mean, 18.8 months), 22 patients had in-stent recurrent stenosis (40%-59%, n = 11; 60%-79%, n = 6; ≥80%, n = 5), which occurred within 18 months of carotid artery stenting in 13 patients (60%). None of the patients with in-stent recurrent stenosis exhibited neurologic symptoms. Life table analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves predicted cumulative in-stent recurrent stenosis 80% or greater in 6.4% of patients at 60 months. Three of five in-stent recurrent stenoses occurred within 15 months of carotid artery stenting, and one each occurred at 20 and 47 months, respectively. Repeat angioplasty was performed once in 3 patients and three times in 1 patient, and repeat stenting in 1 patient, without complications. One of these patients demonstrated asymptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion 1 year after repeat intervention. Conclusions: Carotid artery stenting can be performed with a low incidence of periprocedural complications. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant in-stent recurrent stenosis (≥80%) over 5 years is low (6.4%). In-stent restenosis was not associated with neurologic symptoms in the 5 patients noted in this cohort. Most instances of in-stent recurrent stenosis occur early after carotid artery stenting, and can be managed successfully with endovascular techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1162-1168
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Life table analysis and clinical relevance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this