Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving evidence-based care for heart failure in outpatient cardiology practices: Primary results of the registry to improve the use of evidence-based heart failure therapies in the outpatient setting (IMPROVE HF)

  • Gregg C. Fonarow
  • , Nancy M. Albert
  • , Anne B. Curtis
  • , Wendy Gattis Stough
  • , Mihai Gheorghiade
  • , J. Thomas Heywood
  • , Mark L. McBride
  • , Patches Johnson Inge
  • , Mandeep R. Mehra
  • , Christopher M. O'Connor
  • , Dwight Reynolds
  • , Mary Norine Walsh
  • , Clyde W. Yancy
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Campbell University
  • Northwestern University
  • Scripps Clinic
  • Outcome Sciences Inc.
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • Duke University
  • University of Oklahoma
  • LLC
  • Baylor Health Care System

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

392 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: A treatment gap exists between heart failure (HF) guidelines and the clinical care of patients. The Registry to Improve the Use of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Therapies in the Outpatient Setting (IMPROVE HF) prospectively tested a multidimensional practice-specific performance improvement intervention on the use of guideline-recommended therapies for HF in outpatient cardiology practices. Methods and Results: Performance data were collected in a random sample of HF patients from 167 US outpatient cardiology practices at baseline, longitudinally after intervention at 12 and 24 months, and in single-point-in-time patient cohorts at 6 and 18 months. Participants included 34 810 patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤35%) and chronic HF or previous myocardial infarction. To quantify guideline adherence, 7 quality measures were assessed. Interventions included clinical decision support tools, structured improvement strategies, and chart audits with feedback. The performance improvement intervention resulted in significant improvements in 5 of 7 quality measures at the 24-month assessment compared with baseline: β-blocker (92.2% versus 86.0%, +6.2%), aldosterone antagonist (60.3% versus 34.5%, +25.1%), cardiac resynchronization therapy (66.3% versus 37.2%, +29.9%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (77.5% versus 50.1%, +27.4%), and HF education (72.1% versus 59.5%, +12.6%) (each P<0.001). There were no statistically significant improvements in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use or anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation. Sensitivity analyses at the patient level and limited to patients with both baseline and 24-month quality measure data yielded similar results. Improvements in the single-point-in-time cohorts were smaller, and there were no concurrent control practices. Conclusions: The Registry to Improve the Use of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Therapies in the Outpatient Setting, a defined and scalable practice-specific performance improvement intervention, was associated with substantial improvements in the use of guideline-recommended therapies in eligible patients with HF in outpatient cardiology practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-596
Number of pages12
JournalCirculation
Volume122
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 10 2010

Keywords

  • guidelines
  • heart failure
  • outpatients
  • quality of health care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving evidence-based care for heart failure in outpatient cardiology practices: Primary results of the registry to improve the use of evidence-based heart failure therapies in the outpatient setting (IMPROVE HF)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this