Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019

  • Veda N. Giri
  • , Karen E. Knudsen
  • , William K. Kelly
  • , Heather H. Cheng
  • , Kathleen A. Cooney
  • , Michael S. Cookson
  • , William Dahut
  • , Scott Weissman
  • , Howard R. Soule
  • , Daniel P. Petrylak
  • , Adam P. Dicker
  • , Saud H. AlDubayan
  • , Amanda E. Toland
  • , Colin C. Pritchard
  • , Curtis A. Pettaway
  • , Mary B. Daly
  • , James L. Mohler
  • , J. Kellogg Parsons
  • , Peter R. Carroll
  • , Robert Pilarski
  • Amie Blanco, Ashley Woodson, Alanna Rahm, Mary Ellen Taplin, Thomas J. Polascik, Brian T. Helfand, Colette Hyatt, Alicia K. Morgans, Felix Feng, Michael Mullane, Jacqueline Powers, Raoul Concepcion, Daniel W. Lin, Richard Wender, James Ryan Mark, Anthony Costello, Arthur L. Burnett, Oliver Sartor, William B. Isaacs, Jianfeng Xu, Jeffrey Weitzel, Gerald L. Andriole, Himisha Beltran, Alberto Briganti, Lindsey Byrne, Anne Calvaresi, Thenappan Chandrasekar, David Y.T. Chen, Robert B. Den, Albert Dobi, E. David Crawford, James Eastham, Scott Eggener, Matthew L. Freedman, Marc Garnick, Patrick T. Gomella, Nathan Handley, Mark D. Hurwitz, Joseph Izes, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Costas Lallas, Lucia Languino, Stacy Loeb, Ana Maria Lopez, Kevin R. Loughlin, Grace Lu-Yao, S. Bruce Malkowicz, Mark Mann, Patrick Mille, Martin M. Miner, Todd Morgan, Jose Moreno, Lorelei Mucci, Ronald E. Myers, Sarah M. Nielsen, Brock O’Neil, Wayne Pinover, Peter Pinto, Wendy Poage, Ganesh V. Raj, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Charles Ryan, Howard Sandler, Matthew Schiewer, E. Michael D. Scott, Brittany Szymaniak, William Tester, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Neha Vapiwala, Evan Y. Yu, Charnita Zeigler-Johnson, Leonard G. Gomella
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • University of Washington
  • Duke University
  • University of Oklahoma
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Society of Genetic Counselors
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation
  • Yale University
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Genomic Medicine Institute
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem
  • Northwestern University
  • Advocate Aurora Health
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Integra Connect, LLC
  • American Cancer Society
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Tulane University
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Scientific Institute University Hospital San Rafaele
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • The University of Chicago
  • Harvard University
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • New York University
  • Brown University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • MidLantic Urology
  • University of Utah
  • Abington Memorial Hospital
  • Prostate Conditions Education Council
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • University of Minnesota and Masonic Cancer Center
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Prostate Cancer International
  • Northwestern Medical Group

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

246 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (. 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2798-2811
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume38
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 20 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this