Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impedance control as a strategy for alleviating actuatorstructure interaction in dynamic testing

  • Factory Mutual Research Corporation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, the issue of actuator-structure interaction in dynamic testing of structures is approached from the novel standpoint of impedance control. It is shown that an effective strategy to design controls for dynamic testing is by designing the test system impedance and that this can be achieved using feedforward compensation. The analysis is carried out in the context of displacement controlled dynamic testing, when the tested structure has a high and nonlinear stiffness. It is demonstrated that stable and accurate dynamic testing can be achieved using the proposed strategy, when this is not possible using traditional feedback control techniques. Furthermore, the impedance control and feedforward strategies are applied in the context of hybrid simulation, a technique of coupling computational and physical substructures applied in earthquake engineering. Here, a delay compensation scheme is necessary in addition to feedforward. Experimental results are presented that demonstrate both improved dynamic testing performance when impedance control is employed, and its applicability in hybrid simulation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationStructures Congress 2012 - Proceedings of the 2012 Structures Congress
Pages2175-2186
Number of pages12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
EventStructures Congress 2012 - Chicago, IL, United States
Duration: Mar 29 2012Mar 31 2012

Publication series

NameStructures Congress 2012 - Proceedings of the 2012 Structures Congress

Conference

ConferenceStructures Congress 2012
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityChicago, IL
Period03/29/1203/31/12

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impedance control as a strategy for alleviating actuatorstructure interaction in dynamic testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this