Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of bortezomib-based versus lenalidomide maintenance therapy on outcomes of patients with high-risk multiple myeloma

  • Naresh Bumma
  • , Binod Dhakal
  • , Raphael Fraser
  • , Noel Estrada-Merly
  • , Kenneth Anderson
  • , César O. Freytes
  • , Gerhard C. Hildebrandt
  • , Leona Holmberg
  • , Maxwell M. Krem
  • , Cindy Lee
  • , Lazaros Lekakis
  • , Hillard M. Lazarus
  • , Hira Mian
  • , Hemant S. Murthy
  • , Sunita Nathan
  • , Taiga Nishihori
  • , Ricardo Parrondo
  • , Sagar S. Patel
  • , Melhem Solh
  • , Christopher Strouse
  • David H. Vesole, Shaji Kumar, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash, Nina Shah, Anita D’Souza, Surbhi Sidana
  • Ohio State University
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • University of Kentucky
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • VA Medical Center
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • University of Miami
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • McMaster University
  • Mayo Clinic Florida
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • University of Utah
  • Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital
  • University of Iowa
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Stanford University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) results in superior progression-free survival and overall survival. However, patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) do not derive the same survival benefit from lenalidomide maintenance compared with standard-risk patients. The authors sought to determine the outcomes of bortezomib-based maintenance compared with lenalidomide maintenance in patients with HRMM undergoing ASCT. Methods: In total, the authors identified 503 patients with HRMM who were undergoing ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis from January 2013 to December 2018 after receiving triplet novel-agent induction in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRMM was defined as deletion 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), t(14;20), or chromosome 1q gain. Results: Three hundred fifty-seven patients (67%) received lenalidomide alone, and 146 (33%) received bortezomib-based maintenance (with bortezomib alone in 58%). Patients in the bortezomib-based maintenance group were more likely to harbor two or more high-risk abnormalities and International Staging System stage III disease (30% vs. 22%; p =.01) compared with the lenalidomide group (24% vs. 15%; p <.01). Patients who were receiving lenalidomide maintenance had superior progression-free survival at 2 years compared with those who were receiving either bortezomib monotherapy or combination therapy (75% vs. 63%; p =.009). Overall survival at 2 years was also superior in the lenalidomide group (93% vs. 84%; p =.001). Conclusions: No superior outcomes were observed in patients with HRMM who received bortezomib monotherapy or (to a lesser extent) in those who received bortezomib in combination as maintenance compared with lenalidomide alone. Until prospective data from randomized clinical trials are available, post-transplant therapy should be tailored to each patient with consideration for treating patients in clinical trials that target novel therapeutic strategies for HRMM, and lenalidomide should remain a cornerstone of treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2179-2191
Number of pages13
JournalCancer
Volume129
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2023

Keywords

  • bortezomib
  • lenalidomide
  • maintenance therapy
  • multiple myeloma
  • stem cell transplant

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of bortezomib-based versus lenalidomide maintenance therapy on outcomes of patients with high-risk multiple myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this