Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 1: Numerical Analysis of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Analytical Aerodynamics

  • Giorgio Diana
  • , Stoyan Stoyanoff
  • , Ketil Aas-Jakobsen
  • , Andrew Allsop
  • , Michael Andersen
  • , Tommaso Argentini
  • , Miguel Cid Montoya
  • , Santiago Hernández
  • , José Ángel Jurado
  • , Hiroshi Katsuchi
  • , Igor Kavrakov
  • , Ho Kyung Kim
  • , Guy Larose
  • , Allan Larsen
  • , Guido Morgenthal
  • , Ole Øiseth
  • , Simone Omarini
  • , Daniele Rocchi
  • , Martin Svendsen
  • , Teng Wu
  • Polytechnic University of Milan
  • Rowan Williams Davies and Irwin Inc.
  • Ing. A. Aas-Jakobsen AS
  • Arup Group
  • Svend Ole Hansen ApS
  • University of A Coruna
  • Yokohama National University
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
  • Seoul National University
  • COWI A/S
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Ramboll Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

IABSE Task Group 3.1 has the mandate to define reference results for the validation of methodologies and programs used to study both stability and buffeting responses of long-span bridges. These tools for the simulation of the aeroelastic behaviour are fundamental in the safe design of bridges and they should be validated. The working group decided to set up a benchmark procedure consisting of several steps to define reference results for this validation. For each step, contributors use their own methodology to simulate the bridge behaviour using the same input data. All the results are then compared, and reference values are defined through statistical analysis. The benchmark procedure is considered as a three-step problem with substeps of increasing difficulty: Step 1 compares numerical results only, Step 2 is validation against wind tunnel experiments, and Step 3 is validation against full-scale data. In this paper, the contributions and the reference results of the simplest initial substep (1.1a) are presented. It consists of the simulation of the aeroelastic response of a two-degree-of-freedom bridge deck section, with analytical aerodynamic coefficients, forced by turbulent wind. Despite the problem’s simplicity, differences in some contributions are significant, confirming the necessity of having solid references to validate software programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-410
Number of pages10
JournalStructural Engineering International
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2020

Keywords

  • aeroelasticity
  • benchmark
  • buffeting
  • flutter
  • long-span bridge
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 1: Numerical Analysis of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Analytical Aerodynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this