Abstract
This article explores the rhetoric of regret as a way to rethink the aesthetic dimension of two hitherto artificially separated late ancient corpora of thought-rabbinic and "pagan." Moving away from the thinking in terms of historicist "influences" I arrive at a point of mutual illumination of the corpora, thereby advancing a new model of philosophical and rhetorical analysis that both justifies the importance of the modern discussion of relationships between philosophy, rhetoric, and aesthetics for understanding the Talmud as a late ancient body of text and thought and shows how the Talmud, thus understood, complicates and raises the stakes in that discussion. I first draw on the framework of this bidirectional analysis for probing the rhetoric of the rabbis and of the "pagan" philosophers. I consequently work against the grain of a modern interpretation of late ancient aesthetics to arrive to a comparative study of the aesthetics of rabbinic discourse.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-98 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Rhetoric |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Aesthetics
- Continental philosophy
- Neoplatonism
- Rhetoric
- Talmud
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'I will regret later: Personhood, repentance, and time in neoplatonic thought and the talmud'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver