Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How to pass a turing test syntactic semantics, natural-language understanding, and first-person cognition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

I advocate a theory of syntactic semantics as a way of understanding how computers can think (and how the Chinese-Room-Argument objection to the Turing Test can be overcome): (1) Semantics, considered as the study of relations between symbols and meanings, can be turned into syntax - a study of relations among symbols (including meanings) - and hence syntax (i.e., symbol manipulation) can suffice for the semantical enterprise (contra Searle). (2) Semantics, considered as the process of understanding one domain (by modeling it) in terms of another, can be viewed recursively: The base case of semantic understanding - understanding a domain in terms of itself- is "syntactic understanding." (3) An internal (or "narrow"), first-person point of view makes an external (or "wide"), third-person point of view otiose for purposes of understanding cognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-490
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Logic, Language and Information
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Chinese-Room Argument
  • First-person point of view
  • Internalism
  • Methodological solipsism
  • Problem of other minds
  • Representative realism
  • Rules and representations
  • Semantic network
  • Semantics
  • SNePS
  • Syntax
  • Turing Test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to pass a turing test syntactic semantics, natural-language understanding, and first-person cognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this