Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How Not to Defend the Unborn

  • Canisius College

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is sometimes proposed that killing or harming abortion providers is the only logically consistent position available to opponents of abortion. Since lethal violence against morally responsible attackers is normally viewed as justified in order to defend innocent parties, pro-lifers should also think so in the case of the abortion doctor and so they should act to defend the unborn. In our paper, we defend the mainstream pro-life view against killing abortion doctors. We argue that the pro-life view can, in various ways, reject the assumption that defensive violence to save innocent individuals is always permissible. Now even if that assumption is accepted, we contend that defensive violence against abortion doctors still is not justified. Drawing on Frances Kamm's work, we contend that there are structural similarities between abortion and letting someone die who needs your help to stay alive; and we argue that it is impermissible to kill those who kill in order to avoid giving life-saving aid.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-430
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom)
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2021

Keywords

  • abortion
  • Frances Kamm
  • letting die
  • self-defense
  • violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Not to Defend the Unborn'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this