Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How do psychological factors influence adolescent smoking progression? The evidence for indirect effects through tobacco advertising receptivity

  • Janet Audrain-McGovern
  • , Daniel Rodriguez
  • , Vaishali Patel
  • , Myles S. Faith
  • , Kelli Rodgers
  • , Jocelyn Cuevas
  • University of Pennsylvania

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. To determine whether novelty seeking and depressive symptoms had mediated or indirect effects on adolescent smoking progression through tobacco advertising receptivity. METHODS. More than 1000 adolescents were monitored from 9th grade to 12th grade and completed annual surveys that measured demographic characteristics, smoking behavior, tobacco advertising receptivity, novelty-seeking personality, depressive symptoms, family and peer smoking, alcohol use, and marijuana use. RESULTS. Latent growth modeling indicated that novelty seeking had a significant indirect effect on smoking progression through baseline tobacco advertising receptivity. For each 1-SD increase in novelty seeking, the odds of being more receptive to tobacco advertising increased by 12% (ie, being in a specific category or higher), which in turn resulted in an 11% increase in the odds of smoking progression from 9th grade to 12th grade. The indirect effect from depressive symptoms to smoking progression did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS. These findings may inform future research on other factors that influence tobacco advertising receptivity, as well as programs aimed at preventing adolescent smoking initiation and progression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1216-1225
Number of pages10
JournalPediatrics
Volume117
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Smoking
  • Tobacco advertising

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do psychological factors influence adolescent smoking progression? The evidence for indirect effects through tobacco advertising receptivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this