TY - JOUR
T1 - How Do People Maintain Consensual Non-Monogamy? An International Development and Validation of the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale
AU - Mogilski, Justin K.
AU - Miller, Geoffrey F.
AU - Jonason, Peter K.
AU - Grunt-Mejer, Katarzyna
AU - Varella Valentova, Jaroslava
AU - Balzarini, Rhonda
AU - Rodrigues, David L.
AU - Sheff, Elisabeth
AU - Al-Shawaf, Laith
AU - Csajbók, Zsófia
AU - Thomas, Andrew G.
AU - David-Barrett, Tamas
AU - Giosan, Cezar
AU - Kruger, Daniel J.
AU - Ley, David J.
AU - Lehmiller, Justin J.
AU - Schechinger, Heath A.
AU - Moors, Amy C.
AU - Ciaffoni, Stefano
AU - Kennair, Leif Edward Ottesen
AU - Whyte, Stephen
AU - Štěrbová, Zuzana
AU - Bártová, Klára
AU - Witherspoon, Ryan G.
AU - Żemojtel-Piotrowska, Magdalena
AU - Prokop, Pavol
AU - Zeigler-Hill, Virgil
AU - Schmitt, David P.
AU - Sarıbay, Adil S.
AU - Lipnicka, Magdalena
AU - Goláňová, Ivana
AU - Hampikian, Ezra
AU - Costello, William
AU - Gottlieb, Limor
AU - Cascalheira, Cory J.
AU - Larva, Michelle A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Maintaining multiple intimate relationships entails some risks and complications beyond exclusive pair bonding (i.e., monogamy). Consensual non-monogamy (CNM; e.g., polyamory, swinging, or open relationships) allegedly reduces these risks and complications, but no one has tried to comprehensively document typical CNM risk management practices, nor analyzed the relationship outcomes of those who use these practices. We developed the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale (MRMS) to examine how engagement in common CNM practices predicts relationship quality among people with one or more partners. In Study 1, a community sample of people with CNM experience (N = 429) nominated the best practices for maintaining CNM. Responses were combined with theory-derived practices to create the MRMS. In Study 2, we administered the MRMS in three international online surveys (N = 4,290) to assess factor structure and construct validity. Factor analysis revealed nine practices: disclosure of one’s extra-pair attractions to a partner, open communication about jealousy, compersion, willingness to care for unrelated children, shared extra-pair sexual experiences, partner (non)hierarchy, sexual health maintenance, thoughtful resource distribution among partners, and reputation management. Data from one of the three surveys (n = 871) showed that each practice had distinctive patterns of association with previous CNM experience, relationship and sexual satisfaction, partner investment and interdependence, and self-reported infidelity (i.e., how often extra-pair interactions feel to violate an existing relationship’s agreements). We discuss how the MRMS may be used to study how people in CNM relationships maintain multiple intimate relationships.
AB - Maintaining multiple intimate relationships entails some risks and complications beyond exclusive pair bonding (i.e., monogamy). Consensual non-monogamy (CNM; e.g., polyamory, swinging, or open relationships) allegedly reduces these risks and complications, but no one has tried to comprehensively document typical CNM risk management practices, nor analyzed the relationship outcomes of those who use these practices. We developed the Multiple Relationships Maintenance Scale (MRMS) to examine how engagement in common CNM practices predicts relationship quality among people with one or more partners. In Study 1, a community sample of people with CNM experience (N = 429) nominated the best practices for maintaining CNM. Responses were combined with theory-derived practices to create the MRMS. In Study 2, we administered the MRMS in three international online surveys (N = 4,290) to assess factor structure and construct validity. Factor analysis revealed nine practices: disclosure of one’s extra-pair attractions to a partner, open communication about jealousy, compersion, willingness to care for unrelated children, shared extra-pair sexual experiences, partner (non)hierarchy, sexual health maintenance, thoughtful resource distribution among partners, and reputation management. Data from one of the three surveys (n = 871) showed that each practice had distinctive patterns of association with previous CNM experience, relationship and sexual satisfaction, partner investment and interdependence, and self-reported infidelity (i.e., how often extra-pair interactions feel to violate an existing relationship’s agreements). We discuss how the MRMS may be used to study how people in CNM relationships maintain multiple intimate relationships.
KW - Consensual non-monogamy
KW - Multiple relationships
KW - Relationship maintenance
KW - Relationship quality
KW - Relationship satisfaction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105033782602
U2 - 10.1007/s10508-025-03334-9
DO - 10.1007/s10508-025-03334-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 41840193
AN - SCOPUS:105033782602
SN - 0004-0002
VL - 55
SP - 517
EP - 545
JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior
JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior
IS - 2
ER -