Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Head and neck angiography in the pediatric population: single-center experience with indications, safety, feasibility, and technical differences among infants, childhood, and adolescents

  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Data on utilization, feasibility, safety, and technical details of head and neck angiography in the pediatric population are scarce. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of their center’s endovascular database to identify all patients ≤ 18 years of age who underwent diagnostic or interventional catheter-based angiography of the head and neck. Procedure-related variables for identified patients were compared across infancy (birth to 2 years), childhood (> 2–11 years), and adolescence (> 11–18 years). RESULTS One hundred twenty-one pediatric patients who underwent 274 angiogram procedures were included in this study. Of these angiograms, 197 were diagnostic and 118 were interventional (including 41 of the diagnostic angiogram procedures that were performed concurrently with the intervention). The most common indications for diagnostic angiograms were suspected vascular malformations in 52 cases (26.4%) and aneurysms in 23 (11.7%). The rate of positive findings on diagnostic angiograms ranged from 27.3% to 80% according to the indication. Access site–related complications were observed after 2 punctures (0.7%). Procedure-related complications occurred in 3 patients (1.1%). In adolescents, the rates of general anesthesia use and sheathless access were significantly lower (each p < 0.001), and the rates of radial artery access (p < 0.001); 5-French (5F) (p = 0.01), 6F (p < 0.001), and 8F (p = 0.03) access; and closure device usage (p < 0.001) were significantly higher. In infants, the rates of ultrasound guidance, 4F access, and failure of the primary puncture site were significantly higher (each p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Head and neck angiograms in the pediatric population were feasible and safe in the authors’ overall experience. Technical differences were observed across the infant, childhood, and adolescent groups, but safe outcomes were similar throughout these age ranges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-227
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • anesthesia
  • angiography
  • endovascular
  • neurointervention
  • pediatric
  • ultrasound
  • vascular disorders

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Head and neck angiography in the pediatric population: single-center experience with indications, safety, feasibility, and technical differences among infants, childhood, and adolescents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this