Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Guidelines 2.0: Systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise

  • Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Wojtek Wiercioch
  • , Itziar Etxeandia
  • , Maicon Falavigna
  • , Nancy Santesso
  • , Reem Mustafa
  • , Matthew Ventresca
  • , Romina Brignardello-Petersen
  • , Kaja Triin Laisaar
  • , Sérgio Kowalski
  • , Tejan Baldeh
  • , Yuan Zhang
  • , Ulla Raid
  • , Ignacio Neumann
  • , Susan L. Norris
  • , Judith Thornton
  • , Robin Harbour
  • , Shaun Treweek
  • , Gordon Guyatt
  • , Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • Marge Reinap, Jan Brožek, Andrew Oxman, Elie A. Akl
  • McMaster University
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • University of Missouri at Kansas City
  • Brock University
  • University of Toronto
  • Universidad de Chile
  • University of Tartu
  • World Health Organization
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
  • National Health Service (NHS) Scotland
  • University of Aberdeen
  • University of Freiburg
  • Norwegian Knowledge Center for the Health Services
  • American University of Beirut
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

610 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although several tools to evaluate the credibility of health care guidelines exist, guidance on practical steps for developing guidelines is lacking. We systematically compiled a comprehensive checklist of items linked to relevant resources and tools that guideline developers could consider, without the expectation that every guideline would address each item. Methods: We searched data sources, including manuals of international guideline developers, literature on guidelines for guidelines (with a focus on methodology reports from international and national agencies, and professional societies) and recent articles providing systematic guidance. We reviewed these sources in duplicate, extracted items for the checklist using a sensitive approach and developed overarching topics relevant to guidelines. In an iterative process, we reviewed items for duplication and omissions and involved experts in guideline development for revisions and suggestions for items to be added. Results: We developed a checklist with 18 topics and 146 items and a webpage to facilitate its use by guideline developers. The topics and included items cover all stages of the guideline enterprise, from the planning and formulation of guidelines, to their implementation and evaluation. The final checklist includes links to training materials as well as resources with suggested methodology for applying the items. Interpretation: The checklist will serve as a resource for guideline developers. Consideration of items on the checklist will support the development, implementation and evaluation of guidelines. We will use crowdsourcing to revise the checklist and keep it up to date.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E123-E142
JournalCMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
Volume186
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 18 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines 2.0: Systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this