Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

GRADE: Von der Evidenz zur Empfehlung. Beschreibung des Systems und Lösungsbeitrag zur Übertragbarkeit von Studienergebnissen

Translated title of the contribution: GRADE: From grading the evidence to developing recommendations A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice
  • Hamilton Health Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

134 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group represents an international collaboration of guideline developers, clinicians, health services researchers and methodologists. Many leading organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), use the GRADE approach because it has led to progress in the assessment of evidence and in the development of healthcare recommendations. The GRADE system distinguishes the quality of evidence from the strength of a recommendation. The quality of evidence reflects the extent of confidence that an estimate of effect is correct if it is used in the context of single endpoints. In the context of giving guidance, it reflects the extent to which confidence in an estimate of the effect is adequate to support recommendations. The strength of a recommendation, separated into strong and weak or conditional recommendations for or against an intervention, is defined as the extent to which one can be confident that the desirable effects of an intervention outweigh the undesirable effects. A recommendation for action requires consideration for the magnitude of the expected benefit and downsides of an intervention for all patientimportant endpoints, the associate values and preferences and resource use. The GRADE system includes a systematic approach to evaluate the generalizability of study results to healthcare practice. Judgments about generalizability, better termed directness, are separated into judgments about the availability of direct comparisons between two alternative management strategies and judgments about differences between the population, intervention, comparator to the intervention, and outcomes (PICO) of interest for a given question, and those included in the relevant studies. In addition to providing an overview of the GRADE system, this article focuses on the approach to assessing directness or generalizability.

Translated title of the contributionGRADE: From grading the evidence to developing recommendations A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)391-400
Number of pages10
JournalZeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
Volume103
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • GRADE
  • Guidelines
  • Level of evidence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GRADE: From grading the evidence to developing recommendations A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this