Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health

  • Emily Senerth
  • , Paul Whaley
  • , Elie Akl
  • , Brandy Beverly
  • , Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • , Andrew Rooney
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Kristina A. Thayer
  • , Katya Tsaioun
  • , Rebecca L. Morgan
  • George Washington University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Lancaster University
  • American University of Beirut
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Hospital de la Sant Pau
  • Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédicaen Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency
  • McMaster University
  • Case Western Reserve University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To provide guidance for the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) framework for environmental and occupational health (EOH). Study design and setting: We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis of published and public EOH decision frameworks, followed by a modified Delphi process leading to development of a draft GRADE EtD framework for EOH. We pilot tested the provisional framework through a virtual workshop series, which further informed guidance for the framework's application. We presented a summary of the results to all attendees of the GRADE Working Group meeting for feedback in July 2022 and November 2022, and for approval in May 2023. Results: Consistent with existing GRADE EtD frameworks, the EtD framework for EOH includes a scoping and contextualization process and twelve assessment criteria. Modifications to the existing EtD frameworks include: consideration of the socio-political context when making judgments about the priority of the problem and feasibility of different alternatives; the addition of timing when making judgments about benefits and harms, the balance of effects, and feasibility; broadening of the equity criterion to include considerations beyond health equity; and more explicit accommodation of variable or conflicting stakeholder views when considering values and acceptability. The new EtD framework is also accompanied by a user guide intended to support its implementation in the EOH context. Conclusion: Policymakers, regulators, and other stakeholders may use this GRADE EtD framework to approach decision-making about environmental and occupational exposures and interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109314
JournalEnvironment International
Volume197
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Decision framework
  • Decision-making
  • Environmental health
  • GRADE
  • Occupational health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this