TY - CHAP
T1 - GRADE
T2 - A Transparent Approach for Evidence-Based Recommendations and Decisions in Health
AU - Schünemann, Holger J.
AU - Reinap, Marge
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Trustworthy evidence syntheses using systematic review methodology are essential to make trustworthy decisions. To assess the certainty of a body of evidence included in a systematic review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group has developed an approach that is used by over 110 organizations, including the World Health Organization and the Cochrane Collaboration. GRADE provides operational definitions and instructions to rate the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in a review as high, moderate, low, or very low for the effects of interventions, prognostic estimates, values and preferences, test accuracy, resource utilization and other health questions. The assessment includes assessing the possible impact of risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias, the magnitude of effects, dose-response relations and residual plausible bias on effects or associations. Summary statistical information and assessments of certainty are presented in GRADE evidence summary tables, which are supported by GRADE’s official GRADEpro software tool. The evidence summary tables feed into the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks which allow creating bridges across health decision-making disciplines and support transparency and trust when making recommendations and informing health policy.
AB - Trustworthy evidence syntheses using systematic review methodology are essential to make trustworthy decisions. To assess the certainty of a body of evidence included in a systematic review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group has developed an approach that is used by over 110 organizations, including the World Health Organization and the Cochrane Collaboration. GRADE provides operational definitions and instructions to rate the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in a review as high, moderate, low, or very low for the effects of interventions, prognostic estimates, values and preferences, test accuracy, resource utilization and other health questions. The assessment includes assessing the possible impact of risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias, the magnitude of effects, dose-response relations and residual plausible bias on effects or associations. Summary statistical information and assessments of certainty are presented in GRADE evidence summary tables, which are supported by GRADE’s official GRADEpro software tool. The evidence summary tables feed into the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks which allow creating bridges across health decision-making disciplines and support transparency and trust when making recommendations and informing health policy.
KW - Evidence
KW - GRADE
KW - Guidelines
KW - Recommendations
KW - Systematic reviews
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85194537208
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-33851-9_84
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-33851-9_84
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85194537208
T3 - Sustainable Development Goals Series
SP - 541
EP - 548
BT - Sustainable Development Goals Series
PB - Springer
ER -