Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (1000) Program Seasonally Impacts Birthweight: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis

  • SUNY Buffalo
  • SUNY Albany
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Low birthweight (LBW) prevalence remains high in African countries and evidence of cash transfer impacts on birthweight, particularly by season of infant birth, is limited. This study examines overall and seasonal cash transfer impacts on LBW in rural Ghana. Methods: Data come from a longitudinal, quasi-experimental impact evaluation of the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) 1,000 unconditional cash transfer program for impoverished pregnant or lactating women in rural districts of Northern Ghana. LEAP1000 program impacts on average birthweight and LBW were estimated for a multiply imputed sample of 3,258 and a panel sample of 1,567 infants using differences-in-differences models and triple difference models to assess impacts by season. Results: LEAP1000 decreased LBW prevalence by 3.5 and 4.1 percentage points overall and in the dry season, respectively. LEAP1000 increased average birthweight by 94, 109, and 79 g overall, in the dry season, and in the rainy season, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings of positive LEAP1000 impacts on birthweight across seasons and on LBW in the dry season demonstrate the need to take seasonal vulnerabilities into account when designing and implementing programs for rural populations in Africa.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1605336
JournalInternational Journal of Public Health
Volume68
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Ghana
  • LBW
  • LEAP 1000
  • birthweight
  • cash transfers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (1000) Program Seasonally Impacts Birthweight: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this