Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gender bias in clinical decision making emerges when patients with coronary heart disease symptoms also have psychological symptoms

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Delayed treatment may contribute to women's relatively higher morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD). We tested whether disparities in treatment may be due to bias in diagnosis and treatment recommendations for women with psychological symptoms. Methods: Fourth year medical students (N = 225) from 13 U.S. medical schools were randomly assigned to make clinical decisions (CHD risk judgments, diagnosis, treatment recommendations) about one of four experimental vignette patients (male or female; with symptoms of depression and anxiety or without). Vignettes were presented as text via an online survey platform. Results: The female patient with psychological symptoms was perceived to be at lowest risk for CHD. Perceptions of risk partly mediated lower likelihood of recommending the female patient with psychological symptoms be seen in an emergency department, take medication, or receive nutrition or exercise advice relative to the male patient with psychological symptoms. Conclusions: There was a gender bias in CHD clinical decision-making when patients had concurrent psychological symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-338
Number of pages8
JournalHeart and Lung
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Coronary heart disease
  • Depression
  • Gender bias
  • Women's health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender bias in clinical decision making emerges when patients with coronary heart disease symptoms also have psychological symptoms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this