Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Foveal dysfunction and central visual field loss in glaucoma

  • Asher Weiner
  • , Douglas J. Ripkin
  • , Sangita Patel
  • , Stephen R. Kaufman
  • , Howard D. Kohn
  • , Daniel T. Weidenthal
  • St. Luke's Medical Center
  • Northeast Ohio Eye Surgeons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether foveal function distal to the ganglion cell layer is an independent predictor of central visual field function in glaucoma. Setting: University affiliated hospital and private practice. Participants: Twenty-seven eyes (27 patients) with normal-pressure glaucoma, 10 eyes (10 patients) with primary open-angle glaucoma, and 47 eyes of 47 matched normal volunteers. Intervention and Main Outcome Measures: Foveal cone electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude, relative optic cup to disc area and their relations to Humphrey full-threshold 30-2 visual field central 4-point mean total deviation (C4MTD) and pattern deviation (C4MPD). Results: Foveal cone ERG amplitude was subnormal in 14 (37.8%) of the 37 glaucomatous eyes and lower in the glaucoma group compared with normal eyes (P<.01). The C4MTD and C4MPD were lower in glaucomatous eyes with subnormal amplitudes compared with those with normal amplitudes (P<.01 and P<.05, respectively). Amplitude was directly correlated with C4MTD (P<.01) and C4MPD (P<.01). Relative optic cup to disc area was inversely correlated with C4MTD (P<.001) and C4MPD (P<.001). Partial correlation analysis revealed that amplitude and relative optic cup to disc area were independent predictors of C4MTD and C4MPD. Conclusion: Foveal function distal to the ganglion cell layer and optic disc cupping independently predict central visual field function in glaucoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1169-1174
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Ophthalmology
Volume116
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foveal dysfunction and central visual field loss in glaucoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this