Abstract
While researchers often debate the use of subjective labels in school bullying research (e.g. "I am bullied...") as a methodological issue, responses to such measures should be viewed as a valuable tool for evaluating student constructs of bullying victimization. Accordingly, this study compares demographic and descriptive characteristics and bullying experiences of self-labeled bullying victims to those students who have been victimized but do not label themselves a victim. Among 192 rural elementary and middle school students, 21.9% said that they have been bullied while another 22.9% met victimization criteria but did identify themselves as such. Based on chi-square and MANOVA comparisons, self-labeled victims experience more specific types of bullying, more total bullying behaviors, and more frequent bullying than their non-labeled counterparts. In light of such findings, the authors discuss the implications of labeling and self-identification for both research and bullying prevention.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 979-994 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Children and Youth Services Review |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2005 |
Keywords
- Appalachia
- Bullying
- Labeling
- Rural schools
- School violence
- Victimization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Factors relating to self-identification among bullying victims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver