Abstract
The theoretical framework proposed by Dienes and Perner sets the wrong standards for knowledge to be considered explicit. Animals other than humans possess knowledge, too, some of which is probably explicit. We argue that a comparative approach to investigating knowledge is likely to be more fruitful than one based on linguistic constructs and un-observable phenomena.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 774-775 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1999 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Explicit knowledge in dolphins?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver