Abstract
Like all surveys, the American National Election Studies (NES) imperfectly reflects population characteristics. There are wellknown differences between actual and NES-reported turnout rates and between actual and NES-reported presidential vote divisions. This research seeks to determine whether the aggregate misrepresentation of turnout and vote choice affects the aggregate measurement of party identification: macropartisanship. After NES data are reweighted to correct for turnout and vote choice errors, macropartisanship is found to be more stable, to be less sensitive to short-term political conditions, and to have shifted more in the Republican direction in the early 1980s. The strength of partisanship also declined a bit more in the 1970s and rebounded a bit less in recent years than the uncorrected NES data indicate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 616-642 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Public Opinion Quarterly |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining politics, not polls reexamining macropartisanship with recalibrated nes data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver