Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Explaining Canada–US differences in attitudes toward the role of government: a test of S.M. Lipset’s ‘Continental Divide’

  • Nick Baxter-Moore
  • , Donald Munroe Eagles
  • , Ibrahim Berrada
  • , Oleksander Chernormorchenko
  • , Paul D. Coleman
  • , Kelly Gaskin
  • , Karey Hatch
  • , Craig Hilimoniuk
  • , Patrick Morris
  • Brock University
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

For decades scholars have engaged in a lively debate about the distinctiveness of Canadian and American value systems. Lipset (1990) argues that divergent responses to the American Revolution led Canada to embrace Tory values of ‘peace, order, and good government’ while Americans pursued classical liberal values of ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’. Other scholars question the extent, or even the existence, of the differences Lipset describes. Using surveys of students from Canadian and American universities close to the Canada–US border, we identify compelling support for Lipset’s hypothesised differences on the role of government in the least likely setting imaginable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-492
Number of pages21
JournalCommonwealth and Comparative Politics
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2018

Keywords

  • borderlands
  • Canada–US political culture
  • Canada–US political differences
  • continental divide
  • S.M. Lipset

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining Canada–US differences in attitudes toward the role of government: a test of S.M. Lipset’s ‘Continental Divide’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this