Abstract
For decades scholars have engaged in a lively debate about the distinctiveness of Canadian and American value systems. Lipset (1990) argues that divergent responses to the American Revolution led Canada to embrace Tory values of ‘peace, order, and good government’ while Americans pursued classical liberal values of ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’. Other scholars question the extent, or even the existence, of the differences Lipset describes. Using surveys of students from Canadian and American universities close to the Canada–US border, we identify compelling support for Lipset’s hypothesised differences on the role of government in the least likely setting imaginable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 472-492 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Commonwealth and Comparative Politics |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2 2018 |
Keywords
- borderlands
- Canada–US political culture
- Canada–US political differences
- continental divide
- S.M. Lipset
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining Canada–US differences in attitudes toward the role of government: a test of S.M. Lipset’s ‘Continental Divide’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver