Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women

  • Paul E. Goss
  • , James N. Ingle
  • , José E. Alés-Martínez
  • , Angela M. Cheung
  • , Rowan T. Chlebowski
  • , Jean Wactawski-Wende
  • , Anne McTiernan
  • , John Robbins
  • , Karen C. Johnson
  • , Lisa W. Martin
  • , Eric Winquist
  • , Gloria E. Sarto
  • , Judy E. Garber
  • , Carol J. Fabian
  • , Pascal Pujol
  • , Elizabeth Maunsell
  • , Patricia Farmer
  • , Karen A. Gelmon
  • , Dongsheng Tu
  • , Harriet Richardson
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Hospital Provincial de Ávila
  • Toronto Hospital
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • George Washington University
  • London Health Sciences Centre
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • University of Kansas
  • CHU Montpellier
  • Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval (CRCHUL)
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • NCIC Clinical Trials Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

941 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen and raloxifene have limited patient acceptance for primary prevention of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors prevent more contralateral breast cancers and cause fewer side effects than tamoxifen in patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of exemestane designed to detect a 65% relative reduction in invasive breast cancer, eligible postmenopausal women 35 years of age or older had at least one of the following risk factors: 60 years of age or older; Gail 5-year risk score greater than 1.66% (chances in 100 of invasive breast cancer developing within 5 years); prior atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ; or ductal carcinoma in situ with mastectomy. Toxic effects and health-related and menopause-specific qualities of life were measured. RESULTS: A total of 4560 women for whom the median age was 62.5 years and the median Gail risk score was 2.3% were randomly assigned to either exemestane or placebo. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 11 invasive breast cancers were detected in those given exemestane and in 32 of those given placebo, with a 65% relative reduction in the annual incidence of invasive breast cancer (0.19% vs. 0.55%; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.70; P = 0.002). The annual incidence of invasive plus noninvasive (ductal carcinoma in situ) breast cancers was 0.35% on exemestane and 0.77% on placebo (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.79; P = 0.004). Adverse events occurred in 88% of the exemestane group and 85% of the placebo group (P = 0.003), with no significant differences between the two groups in terms of skeletal fractures, cardiovascular events, other cancers, or treatment-related deaths. Minimal quality-of-life differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Exemestane significantly reduced invasive breast cancers in postmenopausal women who were at moderately increased risk for breast cancer. During a median follow-up period of 3 years, exemestane was associated with no serious toxic effects and only minimal changes in health-related quality of life. (Funded by Pfizer and others; NCIC CTG MAP.3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00083174.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2381-2391
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume364
Issue number25
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 23 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this