Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin

    • University of Manitoba
    • SUNY Buffalo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    124 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Purpose: This paper aims to examine varied surface treatments combined with adhesive bonding to ascertain the highest bond strength of the composite resin repair. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 specimens was made using an increment technique. The prepared specimens were aged for 20 days in 37° ± 2°C water and then kept for 24 h at room temperature. The samples were separated into 5 groups of 20, and each group then received a different surface treatment (control group, phosphoric acid, diamond bur, air abrasion, silane primer combined with a diamond bur treatment). The effect of each surface treatment on the bond strength was determined by a shear bond test. Results: Specimens that received surface treatment with a diamond bur exhibited higher shear bond strengths than any of the other repaired groups (p < 0.05). Those treated with air abrasion had the second highest shear bond strengths, but without a statistically significant difference when compared to the control group (p > 0.05). Specimens treated with phosphoric acid showed virtually no difference compared to the specimens of the control group (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Statistical analysis revealed that surface treatment with a diamond bur results in higher shear bond strength than other tested methods.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)41-49
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - 2005

    Keywords

    • Bond strength
    • Composite resin
    • Dental materials
    • Dentin bonding agents
    • Restoration repair
    • Surface treatment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this