Abstract
Drug-repurposing technologies are growing in number and maturing. However, comparisons to each other and to reality are hindered because of a lack of consensus with respect to performance evaluation. Such comparability is necessary to determine scientific merit and to ensure that only meaningful predictions from repurposing technologies carry through to further validation and eventual patient use. Here, we review and compare performance evaluation measures for these technologies using version 2 of our shotgun repurposing Computational Analysis of Novel Drug Opportunities (CANDO) platform to illustrate their benefits, drawbacks, and limitations. Understanding and using different performance evaluation metrics ensures robust cross-platform comparability, enabling us to continue to strive toward optimal repurposing by decreasing the time and cost of drug discovery and development.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 49-64 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Drug Discovery Today |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2022 |
Keywords
- Area under the curve
- Biomedical Informatics
- Computational drug repositioning
- Computational drug repurposing
- Drug repositioning
- Drug repurposing
- Normalized discounted cumulative gain
- Performance evaluation
- Performance metrics
- Validation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the performance of drug-repurposing technologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver